The move towards One World Government: Part 3 (Modern secret societies, bankers, world leaders, organisations and national and international institutions)
Introduction
Part 1 in this series is a general introduction to what we see as a determined drive towards One World Government. We explained how this trend is prophesied in the Bible and has its roots in the ancient city of Babel.
In Part 2 we discussed the global elite, including bankers and ancient secret societies behind this development. We also discussed the link between Kabbalistic occult, secret societies and Jewish financiers and spoke about the societies' secret Utopian dream and how they are setting the stage for the coming Antichrist and his global government.
Finally, we referred to the banking families of Rothschild, Rockefeller and Morgan and to the creation of the Federal Reserve System which has given them, and other global bankers, untold wealth and power, so much so that they are able to create global financial crises in order to create more wealth for themselves. There is also good evidence that they are behind every major military conflict.
Here in Part 3 we’ll look at how they have created, or been involved with, a number of new secret societies, tax exempt foundations, so-called 'alphabet agencies' and college fraternals (e.g. Skull and Bones, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers, Club of Rome, Trilateral Commission, CIA, NSA, FBI) in order to further their cause and at the same time, conceal their true agenda.
Modern secret societies
There can be no argument regarding the reality of these societies, foundations, college fraternals, etc. Today, there are more than 40,000 tax exempt foundations operating within the United States alone and many of these can be shown to be furthering the secret societies' agenda of globalisation and centralised government. Many are secretive and directly linked to Skull and Bones, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Illuminati and other secret societies.
It can be shown that members of these societies frequently become high ranking government officials and in their new role, are seen to implement policies conceived within the societies. Jim Marrs in his book: 'Rule by Secrecy' says:
These societies hold considerable sway over national elections and policy, yet seem strangely immune to any investigation, whether by government or the mass media. Since its inception in 1913, there has never been an outside, objective audit of the Federal Reserve System despite periodic calls for such. The same can be said for the powerful private foundations which direct so much of modern science and culture.
Taken together the facts suggest that the overall goal of these modern societies is to bring about one world government with attendant centralised social control and loss of national sovereignty. The objective is coming ever closer to reality, largely through increasing corporate and financial control over both governments and economics.
Samuel Berger, former President Clinton's national security adviser and a regular attendee at the Bildergerger meetings, revealed the Bilderberger's agenda when he stated:
Globalisation - the process of accelerating economic, technological, cultural and political integration - is not a choice. It is a growing fact. It is a fact that we ignore at our peril.
Secrecy is at the heart of these new societies and foundations. The Council on Foreign Relations publishes a membership role, but its members are pledged to secrecy regarding its goals and operations. The Bilderbergers keep both their agenda and membership secret. The Trilateral Commission publishes its membership as well as position papers, but its inner workings are kept secret.
If these and similar secret societies and the numerous front organisations they control are innocent and well intentioned, why then all the secrecy? Here at Christian Spectrum we believe that any activity that is justified and honourable should not fear public scrutiny.
Let's look now in more detail at some of these relatively modern secret societies, foundations, college fraternals and other national and international organisations.
Skull and Bones
Skull and Bones is a highly secret fraternal order founded at Yale University in 1832 and has been the source of numerous government officials who have furthered the globalist agenda. It’s thought to have been a chapter of an earlier German secret society sometimes known as Chapter 322. Because the official skull and crossbones emblem is the same as that of the Illuminati, some have argued that the German society may well have been the Illuminati itself.
It is clear that Skull and Bones men control the Council on Foreign Relations (see below) and that its membership comes from a core group of perhaps 20-30 families. What is also indisputable is that members of the order have either set up or penetrated just about every significant research, policy and opinion-making organisation, foundation and agency in the US. Authors Tarpley and Chaitkin in their expose of the Bush family wrote:
The present century owes much of its record of horrors to the influential Anglophile American families which came to dominate and employ the Skull and Bones Society as a political recruiting agency . . .
The League of Nations
Several world leaders including President Woodrow Wilson advocated the need for an international organisation to preserve peace and settle disputes by arbitration following World War One. They claimed that by organising human affairs they could abolish the threat of war and bring lasting peace.
They saw global governance in the sense of new collective efforts to address worldwide problems beyond the capacity of individual nation states, while at the same time respecting the right of nations to self-determination. Those behind it however were, more importantly, committed advocates of One World Government.
Edward House, an Illuminist agent and confidential adviser to Woodrow Wilson, was committed to the one-world interests of the Rothschild-Warburg-Rockefeller cartel, and served as their point man in the White House, particularly in the areas of banking and foreign affairs. In 1917, he gathered around one hundred prominent men to discuss the post-war world.
These men were globalist in nature and called for the removal of 'all economic barriers' between nations, 'equality of trade conditions' and the formation of 'a general association of nations.'
House had earlier persuaded Woodrow Wilson to ratify the Federal Reserve Act and had undertaken secret missions to Europe as Wilson’s chief foreign diplomat. He was a key player in involving the US in the war.
He also played a major role in the formation of the League of Nations in 1920, which was funded with Rockefeller money and based in Geneva. This was a strategic plank in the world government agenda. His plans were temporarily frustrated when the US voted against joining the League. The constitution of the League of Nations was adopted by the Paris Peace Conference in 1919.
The League of Nations ultimately however proved to be a failure and was eventually replaced with the United Nations.
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)
At the same Paris Peace Conference, in order to defend the foreign interests of the US and Britain, it was also decided to establish an advisory council to their respective governments on international affairs. Two separate but co-operating organisations were formed; the Council on Foreign Relations in New York and the sister organisation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs in London. Needless to say they had a globalist agenda.
The latter also became known as the Chatham House Study Group and it’s said today that British foreign policy often emanates from Chatham House. It could be said that the RIIA had roots in an earlier secret society - the Round Table which had been established around 1910 by diamond magnet Cecil Rhodes.
Rhodes called his secret society the Round Table after the legendary meeting place of King Arthur. Lord Victor Rothschild and Lord Milner were part of Rhodes inner Circle of Initiates. Round Tables spread throughout the world and wherever they did they took control of fiscal and monetary policies and political leadership.
Rhodes had been born in 1853 and studied at Oxford where he had fallen under the spell of John Ruskin. Ruskin, on giving up his belief in God, had read the esoteric writings of Plato and Madame Blavatsk the founder of the Theosophical Society. According to Marrs:
Ruskin, who reportedly read Plato's 'Republic' every day, embraced Plato's concept of the perfect society being one that had structure imposed from centralised leadership - a ruling class - downward. Marx and Engles, the founders of modern communism, also were students of Plato and echoed Ruskin's views. Advocating tight central control over the state, either by a dictator or a special ruling class, Ruskin proclaimed 'My continual aim has been to show the eternal superiority of some men over others, sometimes even of one man to all others.'
On Rhodes death in 1902, Rothschild, Milner and other international bankers gained complete control over the Round Tables. The RIIA was seen by many to have been an umbrella organisation for the Round Table.
Edward House was again a key player in the establishment of the Council on Foreign Relations. Article II of the CFR's bylaws stated that anyone revealing details of CFR meetings would be dropped from membership.
All the founders of these organisations were approved by Baron Edmond de Rothschild of France, who dominated the Paris Peace Conference. The CFR's invitation only membership, was originally limited to 1,600 participants, but today it numbers more than 3,300 representing the most influential leaders in finance, commerce, communications and academia.
Finance for the CFR came from the same financiers as were involved in the Federal Reserve and included, amongst others, J P Morgan, Paul Warburg and John D Rockefeller. Over the years, CFR Directors have included David Rockefeller (1949-85), George H W Bush (1977-79) and Henry Kissinger (1977-81).
The CFR played a key role in American policy during World War II and journalist J Anthony Lucas noted:
From 1945 to well into the '60's, Council members were at the forefront of American globalist activism.
A 1997 mission statement of the CFR stated:
The council is merely a unique membership organisation and think tank that educates members and staff to serve the nation with ideas for a better and safer world.
One would have to dispute this since the CFR can be shown to have had a hand in every major 20th century conflict. In a 1975 book entitled: 'Kissinger on the Couch,' co-authored with Phyliss Schlafly, Admiral Chester Ward a long time CFR member says:
Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the US government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition.
When it comes to foreign affairs, it's difficult to point to a single major policy in foreign affairs which was opposed to thinking within the CFR. It is also worth pointing out that nearly every CIA director has been a CFR member.
Surrounding key advisory positions in US government with CFR members was the strategy for implementing the New World Order. It also targets the fields of education, media, military and banking with the aim of having CFR members as leaders in these arenas.
By the outbreak of the Second World War the CFR had a strong foothold in both the Democratic and Republican parties in the US. By this time, through Roosevelt, the CFR had control of the State Department and foreign policy. Rene Wormser of the Reece Committee said:
(The) organisation became virtually an agency of the government when WW2 broke out. The Rockefeller Foundation has started and financed certain studies known as the War and Peace Studies, manned largely by associates of the Council; the State Department, in due course, took these Studies over, retaining the major personnel which the CFR had supplied.
The term New World Order largely replaced the term One World Government following the end of the Cold War – deliberately so, in order for people to become conditioned to the term and less threatened by it. In fact, US citizens are very familiar with it since ‘The New Order of the Ages’ has been written in Latin on the reverse of the US dollar bill since the time of Freemason Franklin Roosevelt, who sanctioned it along with the Masonic symbols of the pyramid and the all-seeing eye of Osiris.
The United Nations (UN)
The Council on Foreign Relations was largely responsible for establishing the United Nations in 1945; ten of the fourteen Committee members belonged to the CFR.
The United Nations replaced the League of Nations. There was no doubt this time that the UN would definitely include the US, but to clinch it, the UN was housed in the US on land donated by John D Rockefeller Jnr.
This could be seen as part of the conditioning of the American people so they would be open to the New World Order. With the UN on American soil, and accepted by them as a good thing, the first part of their strategy for One World Government, was complete.
As we said in Part 1, in 1995 the United Nations published a 420 page report: ‘Our Global Neighbourhood’, which outlined a plan for global governance, advancing the view that nations are interdependent and calling for a strengthened UN. The report said:
It is our firm conclusion that the United Nations must continue to play a central role in global governance. With its universality, it is the only forum where the governments of the world come together on an equal footing and on a regular basis to try to resolve the world's most pressing problems. Every effort must be made to give it the credibility and resources it requires to fulfil its responsibilities . . . it may serve as the principal mechanism through which governments collaboratively engage each other and other sectors of society in the multilateral management of global affairs.
The report was criticised by bodies advocating national sovereignty. By 1996 the term ‘global governance’ had replaced New World Order in many communications.
In 2002 Switzerland became the last country on earth to become part of the UN (although Vatican City is not part). In effect, the UN at that point became a type of limited world government. Today the globalist strategy can be seen in the founding of numerous national, regional and international organisations such as the World Health Organisation, World Bank, International Monetary Fund, the International Criminal Court, etc.
Left-wing liberal progressives and elites have generally welcomed these new international organisations and regimes, but would argue that they don’t go far enough. They see the United Nations as a forum for discussion and co-ordination between sovereign governments without being fully empowered to achieve what they see as the real aim - One World Government.
Nevertheless, the UN is now at the very heart of the drive towards global governance. Many are calling for a renewed role for the UN. In the 1990's the then General Secretary Kofi Annan appointed Maurice Strong to reorganise the UN and in 1998 he published a document entitled: 'Renewing the United Nations: A Programme for Reform.' It is a step by step programme to implement many of the recommendations advanced in an earlier report entitled: 'Our Global Neighbourhood.'
Dr Peter Jones in his book: ' Capturing the Pagan Mind,' says:
Other major UN power grabs include plans for the disarmament of all sovereign states, a UN police force and standing army, a common world currency and economic system, world education, a global taxation system . . . '
In his September 1990 'Towards a New World Order' speech President George H W Bush said:
Until now, the world we've known has been a world divided - a world of barbed wire and concrete block, conflict and cold war. Now, we can see a new world coming into view. A world in which there is the very real prospect of a New World Order.
In the words of Winston Churchill, a ‘world order’ in which ‘the principles of justice and fair play . . . protect the weak against the strong . . .’ A world where the United Nations, freed from cold war stalemate, is poised to fulfil the historic vision of its founders. A world in which freedom and respect for human rights find a home among all nations.
The UN called the Millennium Summit in 2000 to discuss a complete reorganisation of the UN. This brought together heads of state and one-world elitist visionaries. The UN organises hundreds of conferences and meetings every year across the world which facilitates a growing web of developing relationships and provides opportunity for the promotion of the New World Order.
In a preamble to the United Nations' Earth Charter it says:
We stand at a critical moment in Earth's history, a time when humanity must choose its future . . . we are one human family and one Earth community with a common destiny. We must join together to bring forth a sustainable global society founded on respect for nature, universal human rights, economic justice and a culture of peace.
Strobe Talbott, who defined and executed the President Clinton's administration's foreign policy from 1992 to 2000 said:
In the next century, America will not exist in its current form. All states will recognise a single global authority.
A proposed new addition to the UN is a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) that would allow for participation of member nations' legislators and, eventually, direct elections to a UN parliament. The Campaign for the Establishment of a United Nations Parliamentary Assembly was formed in 2007 to co-ordinate pro-UNPA efforts.
All of the above key players seek by various means to subvert national sovereignty, representative government and to exert power and influence through what have been described as ‘global gates’ – the UN, EU, WTO, NATO, IMF, G8, G20, International Criminal Court, World Bank, etc. In and through these forums, leaders, ministers and government officials from individual nations make decisions that ultimately determine the destiny of all nations.
Every new global crisis and the continuing war on terror are seen as reasons to call for global solutions and the New World Order. The global elite believe that unity will come from crisis and so every crisis in their eyes is positive whether it be environmental, poverty, economic, terrorism, overpopulation, political instability, war or the nuclear threat. UN agencies monitor and announce each new threat as it occurs, whilst calling for global measures to combat each one.
Whilst there is currently no actual global functional military, executive, legislature, judiciary or constitution with jurisdiction over the entire planet, nevertheless globalisation and the New World Order is already to some degree a political, economic, religious, social, legal, environmental and physical fact of life. As we have said previously individual nation-states are increasingly ruled by the influential elite of these emerging private, international and global bodies.
In the last 30 years more and more of the UK's national sovereignty has been yielded to the EU and UN. Our individual and national rights and freedoms are being systematically destroyed in the name of globalisation, unity, peace and security. The global elite argue that in centralising power they can protect the world from poverty and genocide resulting from the proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.
The UN is obviously a major achievement in the CFR agenda, but it was clearly apparent that they could not implement a totally New World Order in one step; it would take several. So they delegated aspects of the task to different groups. We’ll look at some of these groups in this article - the Bilderbergers, the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission. But first we'll look at the WPCA.
The World Constitution and Parliament Association (WCPA)
The WCPA was founded in 1959 in Colorado. This association has assembled a Provisional World Parliament, which has convened several meetings over the years pushing the New World Order and has adopted a number of World Legislative Acts. By the end of the 1980’s they had drafted a world constitution and several national parliaments and governments had already ratified it, since the members were part of these groups.
The strategy was, and is, to keep their plans and activities as quiet as possible and restricted to as few as possible until, when the groundwork is in place, the WCPA and the New Age network can rush to implementation before any opposition has a chance to get in the way.
To protect themselves, they have sought to have their world constitution protected under the US Constitution – the very document it is out to replace.
The WCPA plan reflects the COR in certain respects. For example, it includes a ten region world government, it proposes a new international monetary system (the New World Economic Order), and it is using the environment as the key reason why a global government is required.
The Provisional World Parliament was addressed by several ‘spiritual leaders’ from the Far East and other religious leaders known to be members of the CFR. They also have an official ‘Spiritual Liaison.' The spiritual agenda is an intrinsic part of the whole WCPA set up, in the same way that it is a key feature of all organisations with a vision for the new world order.
Networks and Philip Isely
WCPA’s original director, Philip Isely,was also a member of World Union, a strong supporting organisation of WCPA. Indeed, several prominent leaders in WCPA have strategic roles in World Union as well. Many are part of the CFR and the TC.
World Union joined with World Goodwill in 1961. World Goodwill was a spin-off of the Lucis Trust. The Lucis Trust, an offshoot of the Theosophical Society has access to high levels of Freemasonry. It should not come as a surprise that many key Lucis Trust members were involved in CFR and the TC as well.
Philip Isely’s name is connected with at least 20 other organisations which push the global agenda, such as Amnesty International, Friends of the Earth, Planetary Citizens, etc.
The greatest number of connections with the WCPA however comes from the World Future Society, of which Isely was a member. This latter society is where the political, economic and spiritual aspects of the One World Government come together.
The Bilderbergers
The first group we will look at that the UN delegated responsibility to is the Bilderbergers. This group, named after the Bilderberg Hotel in Holland where it was first discovered by the public in 1954, comprises prominent businessmen, politicians, bankers, educators, media owners and managers and military leaders from every key nation. They meet in secret each year to discuss the issues of the day.
The primary impetus for the Bilderberger meetings came from Dutch Prince Bernhard and, according to several sources, meetings are often attended by royalty from Britain, Sweden, Holland and Spain. Just like the Trilateral Commission (see below) and the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers often carry cross membership in two or more of these three groups. The leadership of the Bilderbergers are nearly all CFR members. Just about every US Bilderberger was or is a member of the CFR.
It’s believed by many that the express purpose of the Bilderbergers was to regionalise Europe – a plank in the strategy of the sponsors, Rockefeller, Ford and others. According to 'strictly confidential' minutes of the first Bilderberger conference:
Insufficient attention has so far been paid to long-term planning, and to involving an international order which would look beyond the present-day crisis (the Cold War). When the time is ripe our present concept of world affairs should be extended to the whole world.
The Common Market, the European Economic Community and the European Union (EU) are a product of this group.
Well-known Bilderbergers include David and Nelson Rockefeller, Thomas Hughes of the Carnegie Endowment, Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, Robert McNamara the former president of the World Bank, George Ball the former director of Lehman Brothers, Edmond de Rothschild, Giscard d’Estaing and Sir Eric Roll the chairman of Warburg & Co, etc.
The Club of Rome (COR)
The second group we will look at is known as the Club of Rome. It claims to be an informal organisation of less than 100 people comprising scientists, educators, economists, humanists, industrialists and high ranking civil servants. It includes members of the Rockefeller family and CFR members.
It is best described as a global think tank founded to deal with a variety of international political issues. It began in Rome in 1968 when Aurelio Peccei, an Italian industrialist with close ties to the Olivetti Corporation and Fiat, invited leaders from 10 different countries to meet with the remit of overseeing the regionalisation and unification of the entire world.
It claims to have solutions for world peace and prosperity; these solutions however always seem to promote the concept of world government at the expense of national sovereignty. In 1973, the COR released a report entitled: ‘Regionalised and Adaptive Model of the Global World System,’ prepared by members Mesarovic and Pestel, which revealed its strategy to divide the world into ten political/economic regions, referred to as ‘kingdoms.'
More concerning, however, is the occult spirituality driving the COR. Peccei refers to his pantheistic/New Age beliefs in the book, linking his spirituality with that of Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, who greatly influenced the New Age Movement - see One World Religion.
Developing politically global, as opposed to national, citizens is its strategy. The COB’s first publication, ‘The Limits of Growth’ (1972) includes this quote:
The COB . . . will encourage the creation of a world forum where statesmen, policy-makers, and scientists can discuss the dangers and hopes for the future global system without the constraints of formal intergovernmental negotiation.
Mesarovic and Pestel also remark:
It must become part of the consciousness of every individual that ‘the basic unit of human cooperation and hence survival is moving from the national to the global level.
The Trilateral Commission (TC)
The third group we will look at came about when the secretive CFR began to be exposed in the 50’s and 60’s. Congressional leaders who had been actively campaigning against the Federal Reserve System began to expose the Council on Foreign Relations. To diffuse the situation, and some would say to deflect public attention, David Rockefeller the CFR Chairman formed the Trilateral Commission in 1973. The plans for the Commission had first been shared as an idea at the Bilderberger group in 1972 and had been received favourably.
The TC was founded under the chairmanship of David Rockefeller as a private organisation established to foster closer co-operation between North America, Europe and Asia (Japan). The specific purpose of the TC was to promote world government by encouraging economic interdependence among the superpowers. Steering the economies of the member nations into a position where they would be completely intertwined, the TC augments the regionalisation efforts of its sister organisations, the Bilderbergers and the Club of Rome.
The TC meets on the Rockefeller estate in New York. It also has headquarters in Paris and Tokyo. An executive committee of 35 members administers the Commission, which meets roughly every nine months rotating between the three regions. The TC has 325 members, of which 98 from North America, 146 from Europe and 81 from Japan. It’s worth mentioning that most, if not all of the important Frenchman who are members of the TC, belong to the Grand Orient Lodge of Freemasonry, according to Gary Kah.
Rockefeller worked closely with Zbigniew Brzezinski, who became the first director of the TC (1973-1976). Brzezinski introduced the idea of a new international monetary system, in preparation for a global taxation system. He drew heavily on Marxist ideals and the spirituality of Teilhard de Chardin.
The TC was, in effect, a newer version of the CFR, with the same personnel and resources; funding this time came primarily from Rockefellers and the Ford Foundation. In drawing on the leaders of the world’s three economic superpowers – North America, Western Europe and Japan, it’s interesting to note that these were three of the Club of Rome's ten ‘kingdoms.'
Many of the original members of the TC are now in positions of power where they are able to implement policy recommendations of the TC; recommendations that they, themselves, prepared on behalf of the TC.
For example, in addition to its newsletter, ‘Trialogue,’ the TC issues 'Triangle Papers' which are publicly available. One such paper, entitled: ‘The Crisis of Democracy,’ was published in 1975. One of its authors, Samuel P Huntington, suggested that America needed 'a greater degree of moderation in democracy.' He argued that democratic institutions were incapable of responding to crises and the paper suggested that leaders with 'expertise, seniority, experience and special talents' were needed to 'override the claims of democracy.'
As we have said, those espousing Trilateralist policies often end up implementing them in the government and three years after his paper was published, Huntington was named Coordinator of Security Planning for Carter's National Security Council.
In this capacity, he prepared Presidential Review Memorandum 32, which led to the 1979 presidential order creating the Federal Emergency Management Agency, a civilian organisation with the power to take totalitarian control of government functions in the event of a national 'emergency.'
Another example of this trend, involved Yale University economist Richard Cooper who headed the TC's task force on monetary policy. It recommended selling official gold reserves to private markets. Cooper became Undersecretary of State for Economic Affairs, presiding as the International Monetary Fund sold a portion of its gold.
Trilateralist John Sawhill authored a report, Energy: ‘Managing the Transition,’ which made recommendations on how to manage a movement to higher-cost energy. Carter appointed Sawhill Deputy Secretary of the Department of Energy. C Fred Bergsten aided in the preparation of a commission report called ‘The Reform of International Institutions,’ then went on to become Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs. You begin to get the picture.
Is it any wonder that the TC has acquired a reputation for being the Shadow Government of the West? It's easy to see why many believe that US Government policy is being directed from this Rockefeller dominated organisation.
The TC also makes no bones about the fact that they only recruit people interested in closer international cooperation. The undeniable ties between America's leadership, the CFR and the TC - together with the fact that globalist banker David Rockefeller has a hand in both - has prompted anxiety. The late senator and presidential candidate Barry Goldwater expressing the fears of many wrote:
What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political government of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the world.
David Rockefeller's newest international cabal (The TC) is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.
Columnist Nicholas von Hoffman, also concerned about this secret organisation wrote:
Brezezinski has long spooked those who worry about the TC, that Rockefeller inspired group of globally minded big shots from the major industrial powers. For countless Americans of both a rightward and leftward persuasion, the Commission which tried to influence governments' trade and diplomatic policies, is a worrisome conspiracy.
The TC is a secret society and an extension of the even more secretive CFR. All eight North American representatives to the founding meeting of the TC were CFR members.
During the second half of the 20th century, key governmental positions in the US were occupied by members or former members of the CFR and/or the TC. There is little to suggest it is not still the same today.
Membership, it seems, gives candidates the right to run for key positions, so both Republicans and Democrats are united in their membership of these societies. Many are also Freemasons or members of Skull and Bones.
Gary Kah says:
It is not unfair to say that the CFR and the TC run our (US) government. In fact, any statement to the contrary . . . would be inaccurate . . . Membership in these organisations has become a prerequisite of running for the presidency or for being appointed to a significant position in the executive branch. This represents a complete breakdown in our political process.
The role of America
With so much of the global agenda activity being based in the US, it’s not surprising that there is a specific role for America in the global plan. The symbols on the US dollar bill reinforce that view.
It would seem that America - a long-term democracy more likely to be trusted than a dictatorship - was chosen by the powers we’ve examined as the place for laying the groundwork for the world government and then for leading humanity into it. Back in 1991 President G W Bush remarked in his State of Union speech:
What is at stake is more than one small country; it is a big idea: a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.
Sadly, the America of today is a stronghold of materialism, corruption and godlessness – the perfect environment for secret societies and ungodly agenda to flourish. If, or when, the New World Order is implemented it will be interesting to see where the seat of power for the world government is situated.
Since many of the organisations we’ve looked at have headquarters in New York there is a strong case for believing it will be in that city. However, the secret hierarchy of Europe may have a European location in mind, and if so they have the power to implement their plan.
Another possibility of course is Babylon.
We’ll close this section with a quote from Marrs which sums up the foregoing:
That luminaries of the modern secret societies - people connected by blood, marriage, social and business connection - are at the controls of the international corporations which dominate much of modern life through their power over business, advertising, government, and the mass media is beyond dispute. They have dominated the scene since the days of Mayer and Nathan Rothschild, Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner, J P Morgan and John D Rockefeller.
And their societies can be traced directly to earlier secret organisations, forming a conspiratorial chain throughout history. They appear to be following a plan formulated and articulated many years ago. This plan, an outgrowth of the objectives of the Illuminati and Freemasonry, found expression in the Round Tables of Mason Cecil Rhodes.
It was carried forward by the 'illuminised' members of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, and their numerous foundations and trusts. This incestuous brotherhood also made ample use of secret intelligence agencies in both Britain and America to further their plans.
........................................................................................
Part 1 in this series discusses General introduction . . .
Part 2 in this series discusses ancient societies, bankers and organisations, etc . . .
Part 3 in this series discusses modern secret societies etc . . .
Part 4 in this series discusses Recent developments in the New World Order . . .